Aaaaaargh! Before the Horse

The evolutionists 'dating' and 'redating' of fossil finds to fit new discoveries is fascinating and sad at the same time. In the most recent case, ant lions, a carnivorous insect that eats ants, are dated way before ants were 'dated' alive, and so evolutionists have a problem: either admit their original dating was wrong and attempt to redate, or state that these antlions must have eaten something else:

"Modern antlions are best known for their larvae's habit of trapping and devouring ants by concealing themselves at the bottom of small pits. But since ants evolved some 10 million years after this antlion died, the hungry young insect must have feasted on something else."

This happens all the time. According to evolutionists, dinosaurs were thought to be extinct 65 millinos years ago, but the grass they ate was not supposed to be around until much later. However, fossilized dino dung confirms that dinos ate grass, which was yet another "complete shock" to researchers. In another example, bird lice fossils have been 'dated' as pre-dating the bird species which they parasitize.

So once again the question comes down to, Who are you going to believe about the origins of the universe, the God who was there and recorded it for us, or evolutionists and their ever-changing ideas? I'm going with the former!