The Truth Expelled from Giant's Causeway

With the development of a new Interpretive Center at Giant's Causeway, evolutionists fight to promote one worldview and one worldview only - their own. Science involves the interpretation of the evidence, but evolutionists seek to squelch any interpretation that goes against their establishment, which is built upon a 200 year old philosophy centering on a billion year old universe.

So what is the young earth creationist's view of Giant's Causeway? Click here and scroll down for a brochure in PDF.

Click here to view the article.

Global Catastrophe?

Truly, science is catching up to the Bible, though to claim that the Bible is true is to allow a divine foot in the door, which is not allowed in the humanistic playbook. More and more, catastrophism, such as that caused by a tsunami, has become the justification for the evidence we see in the fossil record.

I just read on the discovery channel web site how some scientists believe that a comet caused tremendous flooding which wiped out 80% of the population of the earth about 5,000 years ago. Compare that to Noah's Flood of 4,500 years ago, which wiped out all but 8 people.

The evolutionist, anti-God interpretation is that, of course, this catastrophic event was the cause of the many, many flood-myths of the world, including the Biblical account, when in fact, the many tribal and cultural flood-myths are a result of a diluted rendition of the original Biblical account. As people groups lost their heritage when the left the Tower of Babel, and replaced it with idolatrous worship, such stories have been passed down from one generation to the next and lost their original meaning. However, there is still a nugget of truth to these stories, and the relation to the original account is obvious.

We all need to take the historical account of Genesis more seriously if we wish to deepen our faith in God's Word and not expose ourselves to the "doctrines of devils."

Evolution Inaction

Because many of my friends know that I believe in a young earth, they often bring to me new articles on supposed evidence for an old earth. It should not be long then that I'm sent the most recent (90 million year old) snake fossil find.

So I wanted to give you the modus operandi of evolutionary teaching via news sources in this ongoing, full scale assault on creationism in their hopes to hopefully slow the rapidly spreading cracks in the facade of evolution.

Step 1: Begin with a forceful headline
Knowing that many readers have a short attention span, this is a common tactic used, something like:

"Ethiopian fossils link humans to 4.4 million-year-old apelike creatures, researchers say."

Step 2: Lead with a strong opening statement:

"Fossil hunters scouring Ethiopia's harsh and rocky Afar desert have uncovered fresh evidence linking our human ancestors of 3.5 million years ago with more primitive apelike forebears who lived a million years earlier and had not yet emerged from woodland habitats.

Step 3: Bury ambiguous rationale in the last paragraph.

"The major noticeable difference between the phases of man can be seen in Australopithecus' bigger chewing teeth to eat harder food, he said."

So, following this logic, my wife has bigger teeth than mine is evidence that she is further along than I on the evolutionary chain.

Once again, I've been proven correct: This is further evidence that I definitely married up. Thank God Random Chance Processes for Storybook Science!

BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.5.1.